Posts Tagged ‘films’

King Kong: Where’s the schlong?

Monday, January 9th, 2006

[image: King Kong]Last night I watched King Kong. I’ve read a lot of reviews calling it the best movie of the year — some practically drooling over the film. Maybe it’s something they’re smoking or perhaps it’s an all around dumbing of the senses from having a career reviewing American mainstream films, but I found the flick to be a serious steaming pile of shit, much like something a 25 foot tall gorilla might excrete and then fling in protest at having been subjected to such lame drivel.

As you may already have been warned, the movie is about three hours long. The first hour is a tortuous drag of unconvincing stage sets, bad acting and even worse dialog. I’m talking about lines so shitty, I was tempted to rupture my eardrums with my house keys to avoid listening to it and only the knowledge that according to everything I read, the movie was going to get better if I could just survive till the island scenes kept me seated when normally I definitely would have walked out.

King Kong does have some good points to it. Once the ape appears and the action kicked in, I found myself thinking of that much abused cliché that critics use when praising such films — a rollercoaster ride. For once, I think it’s an appropriate analogy. The effects are the best I think I’ve ever seen and the action choreography (primarily involving CGI characters) is mind-boggling. On these merits, I think the movie is worth seeing in the theater, especially to get the full effect from the sound. Kong makes some pretty bad-ass noise.

The other positive thing that struck me later, after leaving the theater was that at no point in the film did I look at Kong and think of him as a CGI animation. His movements, expressions, detail and above all, sounds were utterly convincing. I didn’t see the result of many hours of wireframe animation and texture-mapping. I saw a solid, real character, interacting flawlessly with real-life actors. Think Gollum to the third power.

But all this seat-of-your-pants action can’t make a three hour movie bearable, especially when more than half of it is dialog and not involving apes, dinosaurs and giant insects. The acting is just terrible. Jack Black is almost embarrassing to watch and Naomi Watts was straight-up retarded. As usual, I felt myself wanting to magically leap into the film and kick the living shit out of Adrien Brody, mainly just for being who he is. He has the kind of face that make me want to disfigure it.

The lines are at times so lousy, as to be laughable when it’s obvious that the intended response was supposed to be tears. It’s a brainless, Bazooka gum wrapper script. In my opinion, things would’ve have been much better if they cut it all out and just showed me an hour and a half of Kong kicking the shit out off stuff.

If you’re going to see it, see it in the theaters, but show up about an hour and twenty minutes late. You’ll save yourself a lot of mind-numbing moments and save yourself from feeling too cheated after you get out all stiff-legged from sitting too long.

It’s possible that I’m being a bit too nit-picky, but the one thing that really bothers me now that I think back on what I saw was this: The movie is about a twenty-five foot tall gorilla. He’s real looking, running around, bellowing and ripping the tongues out of big, mean dinosaurs, yet he has no genitals.

If he’s twenty-five feet, there should be something like a five-foot johnson, swaying in the wind. His balls alone should be knocking down small trees, but for some reason, they’re just not there. WTF? Is he a eunuch? Does this explain why he’s the only ape on the island? Is this why he’s so pissed off all the time? I’d be pretty mad, if I were him.